---Advertisement---

Kyleena Lawsuit 2026: Payouts, Eligibility, Filing

lawdrafted.com
On: June 1, 2026 |
30 Views

The Kyleena lawsuit involves claims against Bayer alleging the company failed to warn women about serious risks tied to its hormonal IUD. Thousands of women have reported injuries including organ perforation, device migration, and a dangerous condition called pseudotumor cerebri.

If you had a Kyleena IUD and suffered complications, you may be entitled to compensation. This article breaks down settlement projections, eligibility rules, filing steps, deadlines, and MDL updates heading into 2026.

One detail that surprises most people: the FDA’s MAUDE database contains thousands of adverse event reports tied to Kyleena since its 2017 approval. That volume of complaints is a big part of why this litigation keeps growing.

Here’s everything you need to know right now.


What Is the Kyleena Lawsuit About

The Kyleena lawsuit is a wave of product liability claims filed against Bayer AG, the manufacturer of the Kyleena intrauterine device. Plaintiffs allege Bayer knew about serious health risks and did not properly warn patients or doctors.

Kyleena is a hormonal IUD that releases 19.5 mg of levonorgestrel over five years. The FDA approved it in September 2016 for pregnancy prevention. Since then, reports of severe complications have mounted.

The core allegation is straightforward. Bayer marketed Kyleena as a safe, low-hormone option for women who hadn’t had children. But women experienced organ perforation, device migration into the abdomen, and neurological conditions that Bayer allegedly downplayed.

Lawsuits target Bayer on several legal theories:

  • Failure to warn about known risks
  • Design defect claims arguing the device is inherently dangerous
  • Manufacturing defect claims in certain cases
  • Negligence in post-market safety monitoring
  • Breach of warranty for safety representations
Key Lawsuit DetailInformation
DefendantBayer AG / Bayer Healthcare
ProductKyleena IUD (levonorgestrel 19.5 mg)
FDA ApprovalSeptember 2016
Main AllegationsFailure to warn, design defect, negligence
Primary Injuries ClaimedPerforation, migration, pseudotumor cerebri

These aren’t frivolous claims. They’re backed by medical records, surgical reports, and FDA adverse event data.


Kyleena Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in 2026

Kyleena lawsuit settlement amounts in 2026 have not been finalized because no global settlement has been reached yet. However, legal analysts project individual payouts could range from $50,000 to over $500,000 depending on injury severity.

Settlement projections are based on several factors. The type and severity of injury matters most. A woman who needed emergency surgery to remove a perforated Kyleena from her abdomen will likely receive far more than someone who had it removed without complications.

Here’s a breakdown of projected settlement tiers based on comparable IUD litigation:

Injury TierEstimated Payout RangeInjury Description
Tier 1 (Severe)$250,000 to $500,000+Organ perforation requiring surgery, permanent damage
Tier 2 (Moderate)$100,000 to $250,000Device migration, surgical removal, hospitalization
Tier 3 (Lower)$50,000 to $100,000Embedment, difficult removal, temporary complications
Pseudotumor Cerebri$200,000 to $600,000+Vision loss, chronic headaches, spinal taps required

These numbers draw from the Paragard IUD MDL, where similar injury claims produced settlements in comparable ranges. No two cases are alike, though. Your specific medical history, lost wages, and pain and suffering all factor into the math.

Think of it like car insurance claims. A fender bender pays differently than a totaled vehicle. The same principle applies here.


Kyleena IUD Lawsuit Update for 2026

The Kyleena IUD lawsuit update for 2026 shows litigation is progressing but hasn’t reached the settlement stage yet. Bellwether trials and MDL consolidation are the key developments to watch this year.

As of early 2026, hundreds of individual lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts. The judicial system is working through the process of consolidating cases, selecting bellwether plaintiffs, and scheduling trial dates.

Bellwether trials matter because they set the tone for settlement talks. When a jury awards a large verdict in a test case, the defendant often becomes more willing to negotiate. Bayer knows this pattern well from its experience with Essure and Roundup litigation.

Key 2026 milestones to track:

  • Bellwether case selection for trial scheduling
  • Discovery deadlines for expert witness reports
  • Daubert hearings on scientific evidence admissibility
  • Potential MDL consolidation rulings from the JPML
  • Any early settlement offers from Bayer

Bayer has a history of fighting hard before settling. With Roundup, the company spent years in court before agreeing to pay over $10 billion. That pattern suggests Kyleena litigation could follow a similar path, with resistance early and negotiations later.

Stay tuned to court filings for the latest movement. Cases like this can shift quickly once bellwether trials produce results.


Key Takeaway: The Kyleena lawsuit is real, growing, and projected to produce payouts between $50,000 and $500,000+ per person depending on injury severity, though no global settlement exists yet in 2026.


Who Is Eligible for the Kyleena Lawsuit

Kyleena lawsuit eligibility applies to women who had the Kyleena IUD implanted and later experienced a qualifying injury linked to the device. You don’t need to have already removed the device to explore a claim, but documented medical complications are essential.

The eligibility requirements are fairly direct. You need to show three things: you used Kyleena, you suffered a specific injury, and there’s a connection between the two.

Here are the primary eligibility criteria:

  • Had the Kyleena IUD implanted at any point since its 2016 market release
  • Experienced a documented medical complication (perforation, migration, pseudotumor cerebri, embedment, or other serious side effect)
  • Have medical records showing diagnosis, treatment, or surgical intervention related to the device
  • Filed or can file within the statute of limitations for your state
Eligibility FactorRequirement
Device UsedKyleena IUD specifically (not Mirena, Liletta, or Skyla)
Injury DocumentedMedical records confirming a qualifying complication
TimingInjury occurred after Kyleena implantation
Statute of LimitationsVaries by state; typically 2 to 3 years from injury discovery

Women who had the device removed without complications generally do not qualify. The lawsuits focus on those who suffered measurable harm. If you experienced side effects but never sought medical care, it’s harder to build a case without documentation.

One important note: some women didn’t realize their symptoms were connected to Kyleena until much later. Many states allow the statute of limitations clock to start from the date of discovery, not the date of implantation.


Kyleena Lawsuit Payout Per Person

The Kyleena lawsuit payout per person could range from $50,000 to $600,000 based on individual circumstances. The most severe cases involving permanent injury or extensive surgery tend to sit at the higher end.

What determines your individual payout comes down to measurable factors. Courts and settlement administrators look at your specific harm, not a one-size-fits-all number.

Factors that increase your payout:

  • Emergency surgery to remove the device from organs
  • Permanent organ damage (bowel, liver, or uterine injury)
  • Multiple surgeries required for correction
  • Vision loss from pseudotumor cerebri
  • Lost income from extended recovery or disability
  • Ongoing medical costs for follow-up treatment
  • Pain and suffering severity and duration

Factors that may lower your payout:

  • Minor complications with full recovery
  • Limited medical documentation
  • Pre-existing conditions that complicate causation
  • Short duration of symptoms

Think of settlement payouts like a scoring system. Each factor adds or subtracts from your total. Two women with the same type of injury might receive very different amounts based on how the injury affected their daily lives and how well they documented it.

The Paragard IUD litigation offers a useful comparison. In that MDL, individual settlements for perforation cases reportedly ranged from $75,000 to $350,000, with outlier cases going higher. Kyleena cases involving pseudotumor cerebri could push totals even further because of the severity of that condition.


How to File a Kyleena Lawsuit

Filing a Kyleena lawsuit starts with gathering your medical records and connecting with a law firm that handles mass tort or product liability cases. The process is more straightforward than most people expect.

Here’s a step-by-step guide:

Step 1: Collect Your Medical Records
Get records from every doctor, hospital, or clinic involved in your Kyleena implantation, complications, and removal. Imaging reports, surgical notes, and discharge summaries are the most important documents.

Step 2: Document Your Injuries and Costs
Write down every medical expense, lost workday, and way your injury affected your life. Receipts, pay stubs, and pharmacy records all help build your case.

Step 3: Contact a Mass Tort Attorney
Look for firms experienced in medical device litigation. Most offer free case evaluations and work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing upfront. The firm only gets paid if you receive a settlement or verdict.

Step 4: Case Review and Filing
Your attorney reviews your records, determines if your case qualifies, and files the complaint in the appropriate court. This could be in federal court (for MDL inclusion) or state court.

Step 5: Wait for Litigation to Progress
Once filed, your case enters the legal pipeline. You may need to provide depositions or additional documentation as discovery progresses.

Filing StepWhat You Need
Medical RecordsImplantation, complication, removal, and follow-up records
Cost DocumentationMedical bills, lost wages, pharmacy receipts
Attorney SelectionMass tort or product liability firm, contingency fee
Case FilingAttorney handles paperwork and court submission
DiscoveryRespond to requests for medical information as needed

You don’t have to do this alone. The attorney handles the heavy legal lifting.


Key Takeaway: Eligibility depends on documented Kyleena injuries, individual payouts could reach six figures or more, and filing starts with collecting medical records before contacting a mass tort attorney.


Kyleena IUD Side Effects Behind the Lawsuit

The Kyleena IUD side effects driving these lawsuits go far beyond typical birth control complaints. These are serious, sometimes life-threatening medical events that required surgery, hospitalization, or long-term treatment.

Common side effects listed on the label, like cramping or irregular bleeding, aren’t what the lawsuits target. The litigation focuses on adverse events that Bayer allegedly failed to adequately warn about.

Side effects at the center of the lawsuits include:

  • Uterine perforation: The IUD punctures through the uterine wall
  • Device migration: Kyleena moves from its intended position into the abdominal cavity
  • Embedment: The device becomes stuck in the uterine wall
  • Pseudotumor cerebri (idiopathic intracranial hypertension): Increased pressure in the skull causing severe headaches and vision problems
  • Ectopic pregnancy: Pregnancy occurring outside the uterus while Kyleena is in place
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease: Severe infection of the reproductive organs
  • Chronic pain: Persistent pelvic or abdominal pain requiring treatment

The FDA MAUDE database has logged thousands of adverse event reports for Kyleena. These reports come from patients, doctors, and Bayer itself. They paint a picture of a device that, for some women, caused far more harm than benefit.

What makes the legal argument strong is the allegation that Bayer had data suggesting these risks were more common than disclosed. If internal documents show the company knew and stayed quiet, that’s the foundation for a failure-to-warn claim.


Kyleena Lawsuit Filing Deadline

The Kyleena lawsuit filing deadline depends on your state’s statute of limitations for product liability or personal injury claims. In most states, you have two to three years from the date you discovered or should have discovered your injury.

This is where things get tricky. The clock doesn’t always start on the date Kyleena was implanted. In many jurisdictions, the discovery rule applies. That means your deadline starts when you first learned (or reasonably should have learned) that your injury was connected to the device.

Here’s how deadlines break down by state type:

Statute of LimitationsStates (Examples)
2 years from discoveryCalifornia, Texas, Pennsylvania, Ohio
3 years from discoveryNew York, Illinois, Florida, Washington
1 year from discoveryLouisiana, Kentucky, Tennessee
4+ yearsWyoming (4 years), Missouri (5 years)

If you’re reading this and wondering whether you’ve already missed your window, don’t assume. Many women discover the connection between Kyleena and their injury years after implantation. A doctor diagnosing pseudotumor cerebri in 2025 could reset the clock even if the IUD was placed in 2018.

Missing the filing deadline can permanently bar your claim. This is one area where acting sooner rather than later genuinely matters. Even if you’re not sure you qualify, getting a case evaluation now protects your right to file.


Kyleena MDL Status in 2026

The Kyleena MDL status in 2026 shows that efforts to consolidate federal cases into a single multidistrict litigation are ongoing. MDL consolidation would centralize pretrial proceedings before one judge, speeding up the process for everyone involved.

MDL stands for multidistrict litigation. It’s not a class action. Each plaintiff keeps their individual case, but pretrial work like discovery, motions, and expert testimony happens in one courtroom to avoid duplication across dozens of federal districts.

As of 2026, the key MDL developments include:

  • Petitions to the JPML (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation) for case consolidation
  • Growing case count in federal courts across multiple states
  • Selection of lead counsel to manage the plaintiff side of the MDL
  • Initial case management conferences setting discovery schedules
  • Bellwether trial selection expected to begin or continue through 2026
MDL MilestoneStatus (2026)
JPML Petition FiledYes
Cases ConsolidatedIn progress
Lead Counsel AppointedExpected in 2026
Discovery PhaseBeginning/Early stages
Bellwether Trial DatesTo be scheduled

For context, the Paragard IUD MDL (MDL No. 2974) in the Northern District of Georgia took several years from consolidation to bellwether trials. Kyleena litigation may follow a similar timeline.

The MDL process can feel slow from the outside. But consolidation actually speeds things up compared to fighting hundreds of separate cases in different courts. Once bellwether trials produce verdicts, settlement negotiations typically accelerate.


Key Takeaway: Filing deadlines vary by state but typically run two to three years from injury discovery, and the Kyleena MDL is in its early stages with bellwether trials expected to shape settlement talks.


Kyleena Perforation Lawsuit Claims

Kyleena perforation lawsuits allege that the device punctured through the uterine wall, sometimes damaging nearby organs and requiring emergency surgery. Perforation is one of the most common and serious injuries in Kyleena litigation.

Uterine perforation happens when the IUD breaks through the wall of the uterus. In some cases, it moves into the abdominal cavity, lodging near the bowel, bladder, or other organs. This is not a minor complication. It’s a medical emergency.

Symptoms of Kyleena perforation include:

  • Severe abdominal or pelvic pain that doesn’t resolve
  • Inability to feel the IUD strings during self-check
  • Heavy or abnormal bleeding
  • Fever or signs of infection
  • Pain during intercourse

Many perforation cases require laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery to locate and remove the device. Some women have suffered damage to their intestines, requiring bowel resection. Others lost part of their reproductive function.

Perforation DetailInformation
Injury TypeIUD punctures uterine wall
SeverityHigh; often requires surgery
Common ComplicationsOrgan damage, infection, chronic pain
Projected Settlement Range$100,000 to $500,000+
Key EvidenceSurgical reports, imaging, FDA MAUDE reports

Bayer’s own prescribing information acknowledges perforation as a risk. The lawsuit argument is that the company understated how often it occurs and failed to adequately redesign the device or warn users and physicians about specific risk factors that increase perforation likelihood, such as postpartum insertion timing.


Kyleena Migration Lawsuit Claims

Kyleena migration lawsuits involve cases where the device moved from its correct position in the uterus to another part of the body. Migration can happen without perforation, or it can occur after the device breaks through the uterine wall.

When an IUD migrates, it becomes ineffective as birth control and dangerous as a foreign object loose in the body. Some Kyleena devices have been found in the abdominal cavity, near the liver, or tangled in the omentum (the fatty tissue covering the intestines).

Symptoms that suggest migration:

  • Disappearing IUD strings on self-examination
  • Unexpected pregnancy (the device is no longer in position)
  • Abdominal pain in areas away from the pelvis
  • Imaging confirming the device is no longer in the uterus

Migration cases often require advanced imaging (CT scans or ultrasounds) to locate the device, followed by surgical removal. In some instances, women didn’t know the device had migrated until they became pregnant or had imaging done for an unrelated issue.

Migration Claim DetailInformation
What HappenedKyleena moved from uterus to abdomen or other area
Detection MethodUltrasound, CT scan, or X-ray
Treatment RequiredSurgical removal (laparoscopic or open)
Projected Settlement Range$75,000 to $300,000
Legal TheoryDesign defect, failure to warn

What makes migration claims compelling in court is the design defect argument. Plaintiffs contend that Kyleena’s T-shaped frame doesn’t anchor well enough in certain uterine shapes, and Bayer failed to disclose this risk factor clearly.


Kyleena Pseudotumor Cerebri Lawsuit Claims

Kyleena pseudotumor cerebri lawsuits are among the most serious claims in this litigation. Pseudotumor cerebri, now commonly called idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), causes dangerously elevated pressure inside the skull.

This condition mimics the symptoms of a brain tumor. It produces crushing headaches, vision disturbances, and in severe cases, permanent vision loss. Research has linked levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs, including Kyleena, to an increased risk of developing IIH.

Symptoms of pseudotumor cerebri include:

  • Severe, persistent headaches often worse when lying down
  • Vision changes: blurring, double vision, blind spots
  • Pulsatile tinnitus: whooshing sound in the ears
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Neck and shoulder pain

Diagnosis typically requires a lumbar puncture (spinal tap) to measure cerebrospinal fluid pressure, along with eye exams showing optic disc swelling (papilledema). Treatment may include medication, repeated spinal taps, or surgical shunt placement.

Pseudotumor Cerebri DetailInformation
ConditionIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)
Link to KyleenaLevonorgestrel may increase IIH risk
SymptomsSevere headaches, vision loss, tinnitus
DiagnosisLumbar puncture, eye exam
Projected Settlement Range$200,000 to $600,000+
SeverityCan cause permanent blindness

These cases tend to command the highest settlement values because the injuries are so severe. A woman who loses partial or full vision because of a contraceptive device has a powerful case for substantial compensation.

The FDA added warnings about IIH to certain hormonal IUD labels in recent years, which actually strengthens plaintiffs’ arguments. It suggests the agency recognized a risk that Bayer should have disclosed much earlier.


Key Takeaway: Perforation, migration, and pseudotumor cerebri represent the three most serious injury categories in Kyleena lawsuits, with pseudotumor cerebri cases projected to receive the highest payouts due to risks of permanent vision loss.


Kyleena vs Mirena Lawsuit Comparison

The Kyleena vs Mirena lawsuit comparison reveals overlapping allegations against the same defendant, Bayer, but with some important differences in device specifications and case history.

Both devices are levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs made by Bayer. Mirena has been on the market since 2000, giving it a much longer litigation history. Kyleena arrived in 2016 with a lower hormone dose and a smaller frame designed for women who hadn’t given birth.

Here’s how the two lawsuits compare:

FeatureKyleenaMirena
ManufacturerBayer AGBayer AG
FDA Approval20162000
Hormone Dose19.5 mg levonorgestrel52 mg levonorgestrel
Frame SizeSmallerStandard
Target UsersWomen who haven’t given birthAll women of reproductive age
Key Injuries AllegedPerforation, migration, pseudotumor cerebriPerforation, migration, pseudotumor cerebri, organ damage
MDL StatusIn progress (2026)Multiple cases resolved, some ongoing
Estimated Settlements$50,000 to $600,000$50,000 to $500,000 (historical)

Mirena lawsuits have produced some results already, giving Kyleena plaintiffs a legal roadmap. Mirena cases established that Bayer could be held liable for failure-to-warn claims related to IUD migration and perforation.

One key difference: Kyleena’s pseudotumor cerebri claims may be proportionally more prominent in the litigation than they were in Mirena cases. The growing body of research linking levonorgestrel to IIH has strengthened since the Mirena litigation era.

If you used both devices at different times, you may have claims related to each. They’re treated as separate products in the legal system.


Is the Kyleena Lawsuit a Class Action

The Kyleena lawsuit is not a traditional class action. It is being handled as individual personal injury cases consolidated through multidistrict litigation (MDL). This distinction matters because it affects how much you could receive.

In a class action, all members share one settlement pool. That usually means smaller individual payouts. In an MDL, each plaintiff files their own case with their own injury details. Payouts are based on individual harm, not a flat split.

Here’s the key difference:

FeatureClass ActionMDL (Kyleena Approach)
Case TypeOne lawsuit for all plaintiffsIndividual lawsuits consolidated
Payout StructureShared pool, equal or tieredIndividual based on injury severity
Opt-in RequiredUsually automatic unless you opt outMust actively file a claim
Typical Payout$10 to $500 per person$50,000 to $600,000 per person
Attorney FeesSharedContingency per case (typically 33% to 40%)

This is actually better news for injured women. The MDL structure means your compensation reflects your specific injuries, not an averaged-out payment split among thousands.

Some people confuse the two because they hear “lawsuit” and assume class action. But mass tort MDLs are the standard for medical device cases. Paragard, hip implants, hernia mesh: they all followed the MDL model, not class action.

To participate, you must actively file your own lawsuit. Nobody automatically includes you.


Kyleena Lawsuit Tax Implications

Kyleena lawsuit settlement money may or may not be taxable depending on how the payment is categorized. Compensation for physical injuries is generally tax-free under IRS rules, but other components of a settlement can trigger tax liability.

Here’s the general rule from the IRS: under Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness are excluded from gross income. Since Kyleena lawsuits involve physical injuries (perforation, migration, surgery), the core settlement amount should be tax-free for most claimants.

However, some portions may be taxable:

  • Punitive damages: Always taxable, no exceptions
  • Interest on the settlement: Taxable as ordinary income
  • Lost wages portion: May be taxable depending on how it’s allocated
  • Emotional distress (without physical injury): Taxable
Settlement ComponentTaxable?
Compensation for physical injuryNo (IRC Section 104)
Medical expense reimbursementNo
Pain and suffering (physical)No
Punitive damagesYes
Interest earned on awardYes
Lost wages allocationPotentially yes
Emotional distress (no physical injury)Yes

How your settlement agreement allocates the money matters enormously. A skilled attorney will structure the agreement to maximize the tax-free portion. If 90% of your settlement is allocated to physical injury compensation, 90% would be tax-free.

It’s similar to selling a house. The structure of the sale determines what you owe. The same principle applies to lawsuit settlements.

Keep records of every medical expense related to your Kyleena injury. You may also be able to deduct medical expenses that exceed the settlement amount on your tax return.


Key Takeaway: Kyleena lawsuits are individual MDL cases (not class actions), which means higher individual payouts, and most settlement money for physical injuries should be tax-free under IRS Section 104.


Kyleena Settlement Funding Options

Kyleena settlement funding is a financial option for plaintiffs who need money before their case resolves. Also called pre-settlement funding or lawsuit loans, this allows you to borrow against your expected settlement.

Litigation can take years. Bills don’t wait. If your Kyleena injury caused you to miss work, rack up medical debt, or lose income, pre-settlement funding can bridge the gap. It’s not a traditional loan because repayment is contingent on winning your case.

Here’s how it works:

  • You apply with a funding company while your case is pending
  • The company evaluates your case’s strength and projected value
  • If approved, you receive a cash advance (typically 10% to 20% of the estimated settlement)
  • You repay the advance plus fees only if you win
  • If you lose, you owe nothing
Funding DetailInformation
TypeNon-recourse cash advance
Typical Amount10% to 20% of expected settlement
RepaymentOnly if you win or settle
If You LoseYou owe nothing
FeesVaries; can range from 15% to 60% annualized
Processing Time24 to 72 hours after approval

The downside is cost. Pre-settlement funding companies charge fees that compound over time. If your case takes three years to resolve, you could end up repaying significantly more than you borrowed. A $10,000 advance could cost you $20,000 or more by settlement day.

Some attorneys discourage funding unless absolutely necessary because it reduces your final take-home amount. Others recognize that some plaintiffs genuinely need it to keep the lights on.

Before pursuing settlement funding, ask your attorney for their honest assessment of your timeline. If bellwether trials are expected soon and settlement negotiations could follow, waiting might save you thousands.


Frequently Asked Questions

How much money can I get from the Kyleena lawsuit?

Individual payouts are projected to range from $50,000 to $600,000 depending on injury type and severity.
Perforation and migration cases typically fall in the $75,000 to $300,000 range.
Pseudotumor cerebri cases with vision loss could exceed $500,000.

What is the deadline to file a Kyleena lawsuit?

The deadline depends on your state’s statute of limitations, which is typically two to three years from the date you discovered your injury.
Some states allow only one year while others allow four or more.
The discovery rule may extend your deadline if you only recently connected your symptoms to Kyleena.

Does the Kyleena lawsuit cover IUD migration injuries?

Yes, device migration is one of the primary injuries alleged in Kyleena lawsuits.
Migration cases involve the IUD moving from the uterus to the abdominal cavity or other organs.
These claims typically allege design defect and failure to warn.

Is the Kyleena lawsuit a class action or individual claim?

The Kyleena lawsuit is handled as individual claims consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL), not a class action.
Each plaintiff files their own case and receives compensation based on their specific injuries.
This structure generally produces higher per-person payouts than a class action.

Will I have to pay taxes on my Kyleena settlement?

Most of the settlement for physical injuries is tax-free under IRS Section 104(a)(2).
Punitive damages and interest on the award are taxable.
How the settlement agreement allocates the payment determines the tax outcome.


The Kyleena lawsuit is one of the most significant medical device cases heading into 2026. If you had a Kyleena IUD and experienced perforation, migration, pseudotumor cerebri, or other serious complications, your window to act may be closing.

Gather your medical records. Look into your state’s filing deadline. Get a free case evaluation from an experienced mass tort attorney.

Your injuries deserve compensation. The legal system is set up to provide it, but only if you take the first step.


Share

Leave a Comment